mirror of
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy.git
synced 2025-07-15 12:40:25 +00:00
139 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
139 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
ROADMAP
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
This document explains in as much details as possible the
|
|
list of planned changes and work to be done on the Cowboy
|
|
server. It is non-exhaustive and subject to change. Items
|
|
are not ordered.
|
|
|
|
* Write more, better examples.
|
|
|
|
The first step would be to port misultin's examples
|
|
to Cowboy. Then these examples could be completed with
|
|
examples for Cowboy specific features.
|
|
|
|
The extend/cowboy_examples is to be used for this. As
|
|
it is a separate repository, we can organize the file
|
|
structure as appropriate. Ideally we would have one
|
|
complete example per folder.
|
|
|
|
Examples should be commented. They may or may not be
|
|
used for writing the user guides.
|
|
|
|
* Write user guides.
|
|
|
|
We currently have good API documentation, but no step
|
|
by step user guides.
|
|
|
|
* Write more, better tests.
|
|
|
|
Amongst the areas less tested there is protocol upgrades
|
|
and the REST handler.
|
|
|
|
Current tests should be completed with unit tests
|
|
where applicable. We should probably also test the
|
|
dependencies used, like erlang:decode_packet/3.
|
|
|
|
While eunit and ct tests are fine, some parts of the
|
|
code could benefit from PropEr tests.
|
|
|
|
* Continuous performance testing.
|
|
|
|
Initially dubbed the Horse project, Cowboy could benefit
|
|
from a continuous performance testing tool that would
|
|
allow us to easily compare the impact of the changes we
|
|
are introducing, similar to what the Phoronix test suite
|
|
allows.
|
|
|
|
Depending on the test it may be interesting to compare
|
|
Cowboy to other servers and eventually take ideas from
|
|
the servers that outperform Cowboy for the task being tested.
|
|
|
|
* Improve HTTP/1.0 support.
|
|
|
|
Most of the work on Cowboy has been done with HTTP/1.1
|
|
in mind. But there is still a need for HTTP/1.0 code in
|
|
Cowboy. The server code should be reviewed and tested
|
|
to ensure compatibility with remaining HTTP/1.0 products.
|
|
|
|
* HTTP 100 Continue support.
|
|
|
|
Tools like curl expect a 100 Continue before sending a
|
|
request body by default.
|
|
|
|
* Content-Encoding support.
|
|
|
|
Cowboy should be able to send encoded content automatically.
|
|
The default should be to encode, but the developer must be
|
|
able to override this default either for the whole listener
|
|
or just for a single reply.
|
|
|
|
* Improve body reading API.
|
|
|
|
We want to have various different things for reading the
|
|
body. First, there should be raw functions for the different
|
|
ways to read the body: basic, transfer encoded, multipart.
|
|
Each should allow us to limit the size of what is read.
|
|
|
|
On top of these functions there should be two more
|
|
advanced functions: one would return the result of parsing
|
|
a x-www-form-urlencoded body; the other would parse a
|
|
multipart request, save files from the multipart data to
|
|
a temporary location and return a proplist of values if any
|
|
along with the files details. This behavior is similar to
|
|
what is done automatically by PHP with its $_FILES array.
|
|
|
|
The advanced functions are of course here for convenience
|
|
only and it should be trivial to reimplement them directly
|
|
in a Cowboy application if needed.
|
|
|
|
* Complete the work on Websockets.
|
|
|
|
Now that the Autobahn test suite is available (make inttests),
|
|
we have a definite way to know whether Cowboy's implementation
|
|
of Websockets is right. The work can thus be completed. The
|
|
remaining tasks are proper UTF8 handling and fragmentation.
|
|
|
|
* SPDY support.
|
|
|
|
While SPDY probably won't be added directly to Cowboy, work
|
|
has been started on making Cowboy use SPDY.
|
|
|
|
* Hooks.
|
|
|
|
Customizable hooks would allow the developer to extend Cowboy
|
|
easily. Two kinds of hooks are needed: before dispatching the
|
|
request, and before sending a reply.
|
|
|
|
The first would allow us to apply site-wide functions like
|
|
authentication or request logging and modify the Req if needed.
|
|
|
|
The second is more interesting for response logging or to
|
|
filter the replies, for example to send custom error pages.
|
|
|
|
* Transport upgrades.
|
|
|
|
Some protocols allow an upgrade from TCP to SSL without
|
|
closing the connection. This is currently not possible
|
|
through the Cowboy API.
|
|
|
|
* Resizing the acceptor pool.
|
|
|
|
We should be able to add more acceptors to a pool but also
|
|
to remove some of them as needed.
|
|
|
|
* Simplified dispatch list.
|
|
|
|
For convenience purposes, the dispatch list should allow
|
|
lists instead of binaries. The lists can be converted to
|
|
binary by Cowboy at listener initialization.
|
|
|
|
There has also been discussion on allowing the dispatch
|
|
list to be hierarchical.
|
|
|
|
* Add Transport:secure/0.
|
|
|
|
Currently Cowboy checks if a connection is secure by
|
|
checking if its name is 'ssl'. This isn't a very modular
|
|
solution, adding an API function that returns whether
|
|
a connection is secure would fix that issue.
|