Experiment with image sizing

This commit is contained in:
Martin Sumner 2017-08-01 12:47:52 +01:00
parent 89b5c43fd3
commit a8c3403a9d

View file

@ -309,11 +309,11 @@ This was tested with the following configuration:
This initial test showed that there was a minimal impact on throughput with running these listkeys operations leveldb when having ``snap_prefold`` either disabled or enabled. All three leveldb tests (without listkeys, with listkeys and snap_prefold, with listkeys and without snap_prefold) achieved an overall throughput within the margin of error of cloud testing. This initial test showed that there was a minimal impact on throughput with running these listkeys operations leveldb when having ``snap_prefold`` either disabled or enabled. All three leveldb tests (without listkeys, with listkeys and snap_prefold, with listkeys and without snap_prefold) achieved an overall throughput within the margin of error of cloud testing.
![](pics/volume_listkeys_compare_6KB.png) ![](pics/volume_listkeys_compare_6KB.png =1000x400)
For the 6-hour test the total throughput achieved was: For the 6-hour test the total throughput achieved was:
leveldb with no listkeys - 272.4M leveldb with no listkeys - 272.4M
leveldb with listkeys vnode_pool - 270.1M (- 0.85%) leveldb with listkeys vnode_pool - 270.1M (- 0.85%)
leveldb with listkeys node_pool - 278.0M (+ 2.04%) leveldb with listkeys node_pool - 278.0M (+ 2.04%)
leveled with listkeys node_pool - 333.0M (+ 22.23%) leveled with listkeys node_pool - 333.0M (+ 22.23%)