Experiment with image sizing
This commit is contained in:
parent
89b5c43fd3
commit
a8c3403a9d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -309,11 +309,11 @@ This was tested with the following configuration:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This initial test showed that there was a minimal impact on throughput with running these listkeys operations leveldb when having ``snap_prefold`` either disabled or enabled. All three leveldb tests (without listkeys, with listkeys and snap_prefold, with listkeys and without snap_prefold) achieved an overall throughput within the margin of error of cloud testing.
|
This initial test showed that there was a minimal impact on throughput with running these listkeys operations leveldb when having ``snap_prefold`` either disabled or enabled. All three leveldb tests (without listkeys, with listkeys and snap_prefold, with listkeys and without snap_prefold) achieved an overall throughput within the margin of error of cloud testing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||

|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For the 6-hour test the total throughput achieved was:
|
For the 6-hour test the total throughput achieved was:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
leveldb with no listkeys - 272.4M
|
leveldb with no listkeys - 272.4M
|
||||||
leveldb with listkeys vnode_pool - 270.1M (- 0.85%)
|
leveldb with listkeys vnode_pool - 270.1M (- 0.85%)
|
||||||
leveldb with listkeys node_pool - 278.0M (+ 2.04%)
|
leveldb with listkeys node_pool - 278.0M (+ 2.04%)
|
||||||
leveled with listkeys node_pool - 333.0M (+ 22.23%)
|
leveled with listkeys node_pool - 333.0M (+ 22.23%)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue