mirror of
https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy.git
synced 2025-07-14 04:10:24 +00:00
Clarify comments about remaining tests to add to rfc7540_SUITE
This commit is contained in:
parent
3969c31824
commit
45158c1da4
1 changed files with 43 additions and 42 deletions
|
@ -406,10 +406,43 @@ http_upgrade_client_preface_settings_ack_timeout(Config) ->
|
|||
ok.
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo We need a successful test with actual options in HTTP2-Settings.
|
||||
%% SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE is probably the easiest to test. The relevant
|
||||
%% RFC quote is:
|
||||
%%
|
||||
%% 3.2.1
|
||||
%% A server decodes and interprets these values as it would any other
|
||||
%% SETTINGS frame. Explicit acknowledgement of these settings
|
||||
%% (Section 6.5.3) is not necessary, since a 101 response serves as
|
||||
%% implicit acknowledgement.
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo We need to test an upgrade with a request body (small and too large).
|
||||
%% @todo We need to test an upgrade with a request body. It is probably
|
||||
%% worth having a configuration value for how much we accept while still
|
||||
%% upgrading (if too big, we would just stay on HTTP/1.1). We therefore
|
||||
%% needs a test for when the body is small enough, and one for when the
|
||||
%% body is larger than we accept. The relevant RFC quote is:
|
||||
%%
|
||||
%% 3.2
|
||||
%% Requests that contain a payload body MUST be sent in their entirety
|
||||
%% before the client can send HTTP/2 frames. This means that a large
|
||||
%% request can block the use of the connection until it is completely
|
||||
%% sent.
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo We should definitely have a test with OPTIONS. The relevant
|
||||
%% RFC quote is:
|
||||
%%
|
||||
%% 3.2
|
||||
%% If concurrency of an initial request with subsequent requests is
|
||||
%% important, an OPTIONS request can be used to perform the upgrade to
|
||||
%% HTTP/2, at the cost of an additional round trip.
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo If we ever handle priority, we need to check that the initial
|
||||
%% HTTP/1.1 request has default priority. The relevant RFC quote is:
|
||||
%%
|
||||
%% 3.2
|
||||
%% The HTTP/1.1 request that is sent prior to upgrade is assigned a
|
||||
%% stream identifier of 1 (see Section 5.1.1) with default priority
|
||||
%% values (Section 5.3.5).
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo Also assigned default priority values but not sure how to test that.
|
||||
http_upgrade_response(Config) ->
|
||||
doc("A response must be sent to the initial HTTP/1.1 request "
|
||||
"after switching to HTTP/2. The response must use "
|
||||
|
@ -431,7 +464,7 @@ http_upgrade_response(Config) ->
|
|||
{ok, << 4:8, 0:40, _:Len/binary >>} = gen_tcp:recv(Socket, 6 + Len, 1000),
|
||||
%% Send the SETTINGS ack.
|
||||
ok = gen_tcp:send(Socket, cow_http2:settings_ack()),
|
||||
%% Receive the SETTINGS ack, and the response HEADERS and DATA (streamid 1).
|
||||
%% Receive the SETTINGS ack, and the response HEADERS and DATA (Stream ID 1).
|
||||
Received = lists:reverse(lists:foldl(fun(_, Acc) ->
|
||||
case gen_tcp:recv(Socket, 9, 1000) of
|
||||
{ok, << 0:24, 4:8, 1:8, 0:32 >>} ->
|
||||
|
@ -762,42 +795,10 @@ prior_knowledge(Config) ->
|
|||
{ok, << 8:24, 6:8, 0:7, 1:1, 0:96 >>} = gen_tcp:recv(Socket, 17, 1000),
|
||||
ok.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%% Tests still need to be added for the following points:
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo how to test this?
|
||||
%3.2.1
|
||||
% A server decodes and interprets these values as it would any other
|
||||
% SETTINGS frame.
|
||||
|
||||
%3.2
|
||||
% @todo (maybe an option to disable HTTP/2?)
|
||||
% A server that does not support HTTP/2 can respond to the request as
|
||||
% though the Upgrade header field were absent
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo Do we reject "http" requests over TLS and "https" requests over TCP?
|
||||
%% Yes, see 421 status code. But maybe some configuration is in order.
|
||||
|
||||
%3.5
|
||||
%% @todo yeah idk
|
||||
%(if the upgrade failed and the connection send this before 101 then
|
||||
% we should 400 and close the connection, but not sure how it can fail)
|
||||
% @todo (maybe an option to disable HTTP/2?)
|
||||
% The client sends
|
||||
% the client connection preface immediately upon receipt of a 101
|
||||
% (Switching Protocols) response (indicating a successful upgrade)
|
||||
|
||||
%% @todo
|
||||
%3.5
|
||||
%(big mess)
|
||||
% To avoid unnecessary latency, clients are permitted to send
|
||||
% additional frames to the server immediately after sending the client
|
||||
% connection preface, without waiting to receive the server connection
|
||||
% preface. It is important to note, however, that the server
|
||||
% connection preface SETTINGS frame might include parameters that
|
||||
% necessarily alter how a client is expected to communicate with the
|
||||
% server. Upon receiving the SETTINGS frame, the client is expected to
|
||||
% honor any parameters established. In some configurations, it is
|
||||
% possible for the server to transmit SETTINGS before the client sends
|
||||
% additional frames, providing an opportunity to avoid this issue.
|
||||
%% @todo If we ever add an option to disable HTTP/2, we need to check
|
||||
%% the following things:
|
||||
%% * HTTP/1.1 Upgrade returns an HTTP/1.1 response (3.2)
|
||||
%% * HTTP/1.1 Upgrade errors out if the client sends HTTP/2 frames
|
||||
%% without waiting for the 101 response (3.2, 3.5)
|
||||
%% * Prior knowledge handshake fails (3.4)
|
||||
%% * ALPN selects HTTP/1.1 (3.3)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue